Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clegg attacks Cameron as personal jibes start to bite

Andrew Grice
Thursday 21 April 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Nick Clegg launched a thinly veiled attack on David Cameron yesterday as he branded opponents of changing the voting system as "dinosaurs".

Amid rising tension between the two Coalition parties, the Deputy Prime Minister hit back at Mr Cameron's declaration that the alternative vote (AV) would result in more "broken promises" by politicians. That was seen by Liberal Democrats as a reference to Mr Clegg's U-turn over university tuition fees and a breach of a "gentlemen's agreement" between the two party leaders that they would not indulge in personal criticisms.

Condemning the "distractions and falsehoods" of the No camp, Mr Clegg told the Institute for Public Policy Research think-tank: "If we want a different kind of politics, one in which parties can work together in the national interest, we all have to grow up a bit. Compromise is not betrayal."

Mr Clegg added: "There are people on the left and the right who preach new politics and pluralism and yet are now so damning of its inevitable consequence, which is compromise."

He described the No camp's personal attacks as "a desperate attempt to defend the indefensible – the old politics of tribalism backed by dinosaurs on all sides of the political spectrum".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in