Annual bill for Lords could rise to £230m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Proposals to reform the House of Lords could cost the taxpayer up to £230m a year. The bill to bring peers' pay, expenses and facilities into line with MPs would add more than £170m a year to the present £56m cost of administering the upper house.
A report by the committee warned that the 600 elected members would require salaries, office accommodation, staff and resources equivalent to those for MPs, who cost £380,000 each a year. At present, each peer costs only £85,000 a year. The Lords would still be the largest upper chamber in the democratic world.
The report, published yesterday, said: "We believe that elected members would understandably expect better facilities and support than those which currently exist."
The report outlined seven models for reform, including a wholly-elected or appointed chamber and a series of compromise options.
MPs and peers are expected to vote on the options next month, before the committee prepares detailed proposals for legislation. But there is little chance of agreement between the Lords and the Commons, paving the way for a clash between the Houses.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments