Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Angela Rayner defends Labour government over donations row saying ‘all MPs do it’

The deputy prime minister said she understands why people are angry but added that donations are ‘a feature of our politics’

Millie Cooke
Political correspondent
Sunday 22 September 2024 06:28 EDT
Comments
Labour MP defends Starmer over donor row: 'He's an Arsenal fan'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Angela Rayner has defended the government amid a growing row over donations accepted by senior Labour figures, saying “all MPs do it”.

Asked about the decision by herself and her cabinet colleagues to accept thousands of pounds worth of clothes, hospitality and gifts, the deputy prime minister said: “MPs have accepted gifts and donations for years. All MPs do it”.

She told the BBC: “Gifts and donations have been a factor in our political life for some time. We could have a debate about that.

“I was from a very working-class background, to stand as deputy leader, to get that position, I had to accept donations to run that campaign because it’s a very expensive way of doing our politics.”

Angela Rayner defends Starmer over donations
Angela Rayner defends Starmer over donations (BBC News)

Sir Keir Starmer, who has a salary of around £160,000, has faced criticism after it emerged he was late to declare a donation by a Labour peer who paid for dresses for his wife Victoria.

Lord Waheed Alli bought more than £5,000 worth of clothes for Lady Victoria Starmer. He has also given Sir Keir £18,685 of work clothes and several pairs of glasses.

Having taken £107,000 in gifts since 2019, Sir Keir has accepted more than two and a half times more than any other MP.

Ms Rayner has accepted clothing donations to the value of £2,230.

She said she understands why people are angry but added that donations are “a feature of our politics”.

The deputy prime minister told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: “I get that people are frustrated, in particular the circumstances that we’re in, but donations for gifts and hospitality and monetary donations have been a feature of our politics for a very long time.

“People can look it up and see what people have had donations for, and the transparency is really important.”

She added: “I get that people are angry, I get that people are upset.

Angela Rayner and Sir Keir Starmer pictured ahead of the Labour conference
Angela Rayner and Sir Keir Starmer pictured ahead of the Labour conference (Getty Images)

“I think the transparency is there so people can see that. Now, if there is a national debate about how we fund politics and how we do that, and I hear that people are frustrated with that, but we have a system at the moment that says if you get donations, that has to be declared and the rules have to apply to everybody.

“I think that is correct so people can see where you’ve had donations and where that potential influence is so that people can see the transparency.”

Ms Rayner also denied breaking Commons rules over declaring a stay in a New York flat owned by Lord Alli, saying: “I don’t believe I broke any rules. I had the use of the apartment and I disclosed that I had the use of the apartment.

“In fact, I think I was overly transparent because I think it was important despite it being a personal holiday because that person, as a friend, had already donated to me in the past for my deputy leadership.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in