Allowing ministers to appoint their own candidates to run public bodies 'would result in clique of white male insiders'
Commissioner for Public Appointments says diversity would suffer and ministers would face charges of cronyism
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans by the Government to make it easier for ministers to appoint their own candidates to run public bodies would result in Britain’s institutions being led by a narrow clique of “white, male” insiders, the man in charge of overseeing the system has warned.
Sir David Normington, the Commissioner for Public Appointments, said diversity would suffer and ministers would face charges of cronyism if the Government signed off on a recent review by Sir Gerry Grimstone, the deputy chairman of Barclays. The review recommended sweeping changes to the way public sector officials, such as the head of the Bank of England, are hired.
Approving the plans would mark a return to the bad days of Whitehall appointments, Sir David added. The system was reformed following recommendations by Lord Nolan’s Commission on Standards in Public Life after a string of sleaze scandals in the 1990s.
Writing for independent.co.uk, Sir David said: “Grimstone’s proposals would enable ministers to set their own rules; override those rules whenever they want; appoint their own selection panels; get preferential treatment for favoured candidates; ignore the panel’s advice if they don’t like it; and appoint someone considered by the panel as not up to the job.
“The main check on these powers is transparency, but that has its limits when no one has the power to intervene if the rules are broken.”
Sir David, who steps down from his role at the end of the month, added that public appointments to bodies such as the media regulator, Ofcom, carried huge power and responsibility.
“Public bodies spend billions of pounds of public money and touch every aspect of people’s lives – in education, health, justice, the arts and sport,” he said.
“Their boards need to be effective and diverse. Candidates must be confident that they will be fairly treated – otherwise they won’t apply.”
Matthew Hancock, Minister for the Cabinet Office, said the Nolan principles would stay “at the heart of the system”. But he added: “Ultimately, choice, responsibility and accountability for making appointments must rest with ministers.”
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: “The Government is committed to a transparent and effective system, which is why we commissioned Sir Gerry Grimstone to produce his report. We need a system that ensures the best people… are appointed and that they reflect modern Britain.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments