Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Alcohol duty fraud costing UK taxpayer £620m

Ben Russell,Political Correspondent
Thursday 19 July 2001 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Customs officers were accused on Thursday of failing to tackle a massive increase in alcohol duty fraud which cost the taxpayer £620m in lost revenue.

Two official reports said HM Customs and Excise should have done more to stem the tide of fraud involving wine, beer and spirits intended for export, but sold on the British market, evading duty which eventually cost the Government millions.

An investigation by independent accountant John Roques criticised the department's National Investigation Service for undermanning and said its work was hindered by weaknesses in management.

A second report by the National Audit Office said officials spent four years drawing up a strategy to deal with the rise in fraud, which grew after the single European Market was introduced in 1993.

Lost duty totalled £668m between 1993 and 2000, the investigation found. Only £48m was ever recovered, leaving a net loss to the taxpayer of £620m.

Consignments of drinks were transferred from the bonded warehouses where they were being stored and were sold illegally in Britain, instead of being shipped overseas.

Customs investigators were aware of the trade, but for four years they adopted a strategy of "letting the loads run" under observation in the hope of gathering sufficient evidence to support prosecutions. That was necessary to secure convictions, but allowed "unrecoverable losses" to build up.

Mr Roques' report, which focussed on events between 1994 and 1998, criticised falling staffing levels over the last decade.

It said: "Tax rates in Excise and VAT have increased substantially during the last decade but the headcount in the department was reduced. In my view more people, not less, are inevitably necessary to enforce collections in a high tax rate regime."

The report was commissioned by the Treasury last year after the scale of the fraud became known.

A Customs spokesman said 62 of the report's 65 recommendations had been accepted and many had already been implemented.

Sir John Bourn, head of the NAO, yesterday said: "In this case Customs failed over a number of years to get to grips with a major breakdown in their control systems which led to an unacceptable loss of revenue. They should, from the outset, have put in place a strategy to manage the risks.

"The actions taken or now planned should lead to tighter controls against fraud, improved management of investigations, and a better strategic approach to countering fraud."

David Davis, Conservative chairman of the powerful Commons Public Accounts Committee, said Customs and Excise had "scant regard for the interests of the taxpayer when they failed to act on clear warnings about the risk of fraud".

He said MPs had asked for assurances about the potential level of fraud in 1994, but were told there was no evidence that problems had materialised. He said: "Unfortunately this assurance counted for very little. The NAO report makes clear that Customs' management information systems were too poor to pick up the losses.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in