Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Police chief shrinks from Howard row: Senior officer tones down speech attacking government policies after dining with Home Secretary. Jason Bennetto reports

Jason Bennetto
Wednesday 05 October 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A SPEECH by a leading police officer who had intended to attack the Home Secretary and the Government's law and order policies was drastically watered down yesterday, after a dinner with Michael Howard.

The speech, which accused Mr Howard of creating a climate of mistrust, forcing cuts in the number of officers on the beat, and creeping privatisation, was replaced with a new version just hours before it was delivered.

The outspoken criticism by the usually conservative Police Superintendents' Association would have been extremely damaging to the Home Secretary on the eve of the Tory party conference.

However, it emerged after the speech yesterday that a new version had been drafted following a conversation between the author, Chief Superintendent David Golding, president of the association, and Mr Howard.

The discussion, in which Mr Howard said he was able to 'clear up some misunderstandings', took place before and after a dinner on Tuesday evening. Mr Howard had an advance copy of the speech, which was made at the association's annual conference at Market Bosworth, near Leicester, yesterday morning.

When asked whether he had discussed the speech during the dinner Mr Howard said: 'We didn't just talk about the weather . . . I tried to clear up any misunderstandings that may exist.'

But he stressed that he had not asked for any changes.

Mr Golding, whose speech had been promoted earlier in the week as an unprecedented attack on the Home Office, said he had been 'reassured' that the association's grievances would be given proper attention and that all future announcements would be made only after consultation.

Officers fear their resources are to be cut and many of their existing functions will be farmed out to the private sector. The critical discussions and changes took place either side of the meal, and the speech was rewritten late on Tuesday night and in the early hours of Wednesday morning.

Although most of the sting was taken from the original speech, the new version still reflected the growing frustration and anger felt by police officers with the Home Secretary. Many feel their positions and resources are being eroded and undermined.

Mr Howard used his speech to the conference yesterday to try and allay some of the officers' fears.

To a warm reception, Mr Howard told the 160 delegates that the period of rapid change in the police force was almost over. He said: 'We now owe it to you to provide for a period of consolidation. That is what we intend to do. The major organisational changes are almost in place . . . The task now is to get on with policing.'

Addressing the question of the burgeoning private security industry, the Home Secretary said:: 'Let me make one thing clear: I am not asking anyone to do the job of the police. You are the professionals in what is a complex, specialised and often dangerous profession.'

Mr Golding said later: 'We have been promised full consultation with the Home Secretary before any major decisions are announced in future.' He added that the decision to alter the speech had also been influenced by a week of meetings which included talks with David Maclean, the Home Office minister.

(Photographs omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in