Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Plan for tougher dog fouling laws

Colin Brown
Tuesday 15 March 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Environment ministers are seeking to force dog owners to clear up dog mess under tougher bye-laws for parks and highways, writes Colin Brown.

The Tidy Britain group and others have proposed the replacement of local 'poop scoop' bye-laws with national legislation to make it an offence for any person to allow a dog to foul any area to which the public have access.

The advisory group to the Department of Environment is considering the plan along with another suggestion that dog mess could be redefined as litter, according to a Parliamentary reply by Robert Atkins, the Minister of State for Environment.

That could open owners to a fine of pounds 2,500 instead of the present pounds 500. Privately, ministers have made it clear that they will not act on the suggestion. The Department wants the public to regard dog fouling as a serious environmental hazard, but ministers believe huge fines would be politically unacceptable.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in