'Pay as you drive' car insurance proposed: The American Association for the Advancement of Science
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.First Edition
CAR OWNERS should pay for insurance according to the distance they drive as an incentive to save energy, cut emissions and ease traffic congestion.
Delegates heard about a radical pay-as-you-drive scheme under which drivers pay for insurance at the petrol pump, as and when they need it.
Such a scheme could cut the number of miles people drive by between 5 and 14 per cent in the short term and 16 to 41 per cent in the long term, according to Mohamed El-Gasseir, a researcher at a San Francisco-based company, Rumla. The system is designed to reduce the tendency for people to use their cars whenever they can, believing they must get the best possible value for their insurance premium.
Mr El-Gasseir told the conference: 'By paying for insurance incrementally and at the time it is needed, we will be more sensitive to the actual cost of personal transportation. Energy consumption will be reduced because we will drive less and we will use more efficient vehicles.'
He said car insurance should consist of two components - a direct payment to an insurance company, and a charge payable at the fuel pump. The first would still vary according to the risks the insurance companies associated with different groups of motorists and vehicles.
The pump payment would go into a central fund, with the interest earned used to help lower insurance premiums. A side-effect would be fewer cars on the road, thus fewer accidents, Mr El- Gasseir argued.
People who drove without insurance would be forced to contribute to the central fund through buying fuel.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments