Key points in the first Covid-19 inquiry report
UK Coivid-19 Public Inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett said UK citizens were “failed”.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There were “several significant flaws” in pandemic planning in the UK before Covid-19 struck, according to the official probe into the disaster.
UK Coivid-19 Public Inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett said UK citizens were “failed”.
“I have no hesitation in concluding that the processes, planning and policy of the civil contingency structures across the UK failed the citizens of all four nations,” she said.
“There were serious errors on the part of the State and serious flaws in our civil emergency systems. This cannot be allowed to happen again.”
Here are the key flaws set out in her report:
– “The UK prepared for the wrong pandemic,” the report states. Lady Hallett highlighted how the pandemic preparedness plans focused “almost entirely” on flu, when the Covid-19 pandemic was caused by a coronavirus.
– In the years leading up to the pandemic, there was a “lack of adequate leadership, coordination and oversight”.
– The UK government’s sole pandemic strategy, from 2011, was “outdated and lacked adaptability” and was “never properly tested”. The strategy was “virtually abandoned” when the Covid-19 pandemic hit.
– There was a “damaging absence” of some of the tools needed to combat a pandemic threat, including measures, interventions and infrastructure. A system of test, trace and isolate which could be scaled up in the event of a pandemic “did not exist in the UK”.
– The “outdated” planning documents were “insufficiently robust and flexible”, and “unnecessarily bureaucratic and infected by jargon”.
– Lady Hallett highlighted the “labyrinthine” of complexity in the institutions and structures responsible for emergency planning.
– There were “fatal strategic flaws” underpinning the assessment of the risks faced by the UK, she said.
– Lady Hallett said that ministers were “not presented with a broad enough range of scientific opinion” and “failed to challenge sufficiently” the advice they did receive.
– Meanwhile advisers and advisory groups “did not have sufficient freedom and autonomy to express dissenting views” and the advice was often “undermined by groupthink”.
– There was a “failure to learn” sufficiently form past civil emergency exercises and outbreaks of disease.
– Emergency planning “failed to account sufficiently” for deprivation and health and societal inequalities.