Key points in the first Covid-19 inquiry report

Your support helps us to tell the story

Support Now

Find out moreClose

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

There were “several significant flaws” in pandemic planning in the UK before Covid-19 struck, according to the official probe into the disaster.

UK Coivid-19 Public Inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett said UK citizens were “failed”.

“I have no hesitation in concluding that the processes, planning and policy of the civil contingency structures across the UK failed the citizens of all four nations,” she said.

“There were serious errors on the part of the State and serious flaws in our civil emergency systems. This cannot be allowed to happen again.”

Here are the key flaws set out in her report:

– “The UK prepared for the wrong pandemic,” the report states. Lady Hallett highlighted how the pandemic preparedness plans focused “almost entirely” on flu, when the Covid-19 pandemic was caused by a coronavirus.

– In the years leading up to the pandemic, there was a “lack of adequate leadership, coordination and oversight”.

– The UK government’s sole pandemic strategy, from 2011, was “outdated and lacked adaptability” and was “never properly tested”. The strategy was “virtually abandoned” when the Covid-19 pandemic hit.

– There was a “damaging absence” of some of the tools needed to combat a pandemic threat, including measures, interventions and infrastructure. A system of test, trace and isolate which could be scaled up in the event of a pandemic “did not exist in the UK”.

– The “outdated” planning documents were “insufficiently robust and flexible”, and “unnecessarily bureaucratic and infected by jargon”.

– Lady Hallett highlighted the “labyrinthine” of complexity in the institutions and structures responsible for emergency planning.

– There were “fatal strategic flaws” underpinning the assessment of the risks faced by the UK, she said.

– Lady Hallett said that ministers were “not presented with a broad enough range of scientific opinion” and “failed to challenge sufficiently” the advice they did receive.

– Meanwhile advisers and advisory groups “did not have sufficient freedom and autonomy to express dissenting views” and the advice was often “undermined by groupthink”.

– There was a “failure to learn” sufficiently form past civil emergency exercises and outbreaks of disease.

– Emergency planning “failed to account sufficiently” for deprivation and health and societal inequalities.