Parliament and Politics: Minister rejects criticism over GCSE results row
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A CLEAR signal that the Government intends to secure changes to the GCSE was given as the six examining bodies met for their annual conference in Belfast today, writes Donald MacLeod.
Baroness Blatch, Under-Secretary of State for Education, rejected criticism that ministers had overreacted to a report by HM Inspectors which said standards could have eroded since GCSE was introduced in 1988.
In a letter replying to John Sutton, general secretary of the Secondary Heads Association, Lady Blatch questioned whether he had read the inspectors' report or the comments by John Patten, Secretary of State for Education, with proper care. Mr Sutton had accused Mr Patten of undermining public confidence in 'a highly successful examination'.
Lady Blatch said: 'Our concern is with the rigour, objectivity and consistency of the procedures for examining and grading.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments