Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parents of truant children will have child benefit docked if they fail to pay fines

Teachers unions say the move will only increase deprivation.

Lee Williams
Tuesday 06 October 2015 08:09 EDT
Comments
(Photo by Matt Cardy/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Parents who refuse to pay fines for their children playing truant will have their benefits cut, David Cameron has said.

The Prime Minister, who was due to announce the plans at the Conservative Party conference, says a civil penalty of up to £120 could be claimed through child benefit if fines are not paid after 28 days.

Mr Cameron was due to say: "There is nothing responsible about allowing your child to go without an education. So for parents who let their child play truant and refuse to pay truancy penalties, we will deduct it from their child benefit."

Under the current system parents face a £60 civil penalty in England, doubling to £120 after 21 days and subject to prosecution after 28 days.

Currently 40% of fines go unpaid. But many parents do not end up in court because councils do not pursue legal action.

But Chris Keates, general secretary of teachers union NASUWT, does not think cutting child benefits is the answer.

He told the BBC: "For some families all that this will do, of course, is increase the chaos and it will increase the deprivation. It won't actually solve the problem and in the middle of all of this is a child who's not getting their entitlement to education."

The Press Association obtained figures earlier this year which showed 16,430 people in England were prosecuted last year for child truancy.

Around three quarters of these were found guilty with courts issuing 9,214 fines worth an average of £172.

Mr Cameron’s plans are expected to save councils money by avoiding the legal costs of taking parents to court. However local authorities will be under pressure to pursue legal cases where parents don’t receive child benefit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in