Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Parents say 3m pounds charter misses real concerns: League tables fail to arouse interest

Fran Abrams Education Correspondent
Tuesday 14 June 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PARENTS have been told to send their children to school on time and help with their homework under a government charter published today. The Department for Education has spent pounds 3m on the Parent's Charter, which will be posted to every home in Britain this week.

John Patten, the Secretary of State for Education, was forced to withdraw part of the draft charter after it was dismissed as 'patronising' by parents. It said they should give their children a good breakfast and send them to school properly dressed.

But the revised version also failed to win approval yesterday. Parents said they were not interested in the league tables or governors' reports promised, and that poor funding, crumbling buildings and crowded classrooms were their real concerns.

Launching the charter, which contains details of recent legislation on school reports, admissions, inspections and targets for increasing the number of exam passes, Mr Patten also announced a new annual report from his department. It will contain national and regional figures on opting out, surplus places, staying-on rates and exam results so that parents can compare them with the performance of their children's schools.

He denied that the leaflet was patronising and that it was unnecessary to post it to 20 million homes.

'It certainly doesn't preach to parents and it doesn't tell them how to bring up their children. You won't find any reference to porridge or mittens.

'The reason for a national door- drop is absolutely compelling and straightforward. The changes taking place in our education system are very important to everyone,' he said.

However, Mr Patten's multi- million pound leaflet won few plaudits. As he launched the document, members of the National Confederation of Parent Teacher Associations (NCPTA), were in a hall across the road from the Department for Education, giving their support to an alternative charter drawn up by the Campaign for State Education, Case.

The Case charter - which the campaign group says cost just pounds 260 to produce - calls for universal nursery education, smaller classes, better school buildings, more money for books and equipment and two written reports each year for parents on their child's progress.

Belinda Yaxley, membership secretary of the NCPTA, said that she had very few phone calls about league tables or inspections, but many on crumbling classrooms, classes with more than 30 pupils and poor school transport.

'These are the issues which face parents every day. They are not interested in league tables because it doesn't ultimately affect their children. Mr Patten's charter does not seem to have any substance,' Ms Yaxley said.

A boy whose parents threatened court action against a school which chose its pupils by lottery has won his local appeal for a place. Christopher Visser has been offered a place at Habergham High School in Burnley, Lancashire, on the grounds that he had special social and welfare needs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in