Officers 'withheld evidence in M50 murder case'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TWO POLICE officers deliberately failed to disclose to defence lawyers vital evidence in the investigation into the murder of Marie Wilkes, the pregnant motorist who was abducted and stabbed to death by the side of a motorway, the Court of Appeal was told yesterday, writes Terry Kirby.
Michael Mansfield QC, for the defence, also argued that important information on the evidence of another witness was not handed to defence lawyers whose cross-examination was therefore hindered. Mr Mansfield was beginning the appeal on behalf of Edward Browning, 41, of Cwmparc in South Wales, who is serving a 25-year sentence for the murder of Mrs Wilkes in June 1988. Her body was found on the side of the M50 in Hereford and Worcester, a short distance from where her car had broken down.
At Browning's trial, the Crown claimed the former Welsh Guardsman and nightclub doorman with a history of violence had rowed with his pregnant wife and taken revenge on Mrs Wilkes when he saw her at an emergency telephone.
Browning's first appeal was rejected in 1991. The case has been referred back to the Court of Appeal by the Home Secretary after it emerged a videotaped interview with a key witness, a police officer who claimed he saw Browning's car on the motorway, had not been handed to defence lawyers at the trial. Browning claims he was not on the motorway that day. The videotape showed the officer under hypnosis contradicting his original account, but its existence only came to light four years later.
Lord Taylor, the Lord Chief Justice, said yesterday that the Crown conceded that the existence of the hypnosis tape ought to have been made known to the defence, but it was the court's role to decide if this was a material irregularity.
The appeal, expected to last at least five days, will continue today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments