Nuclear firm chairman attacks delay over waste
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ONE OF the leaders of Britain's nuclear industry yesterday launched an outspoken attack on government delay and indecision over nuclear waste disposal.
According to James Hann, chairman of Scottish Nuclear, electricity consumers will have to pay nearly pounds 1m a week extra because the Government has postponed a decision on his company's scheme to store nuclear fuel at its power stations rather than send it for reprocessing.
Mr Hann voiced the frustration ofthe industry when he told a press conference in London that 'every time our industry tries to take a step forward, it is being halted in its tracks as a result of operating in the public sector'.
He was speaking as Scottish Nuclear announced a 9 per cent increase in net profits last year to pounds 72m from pounds 66m. In the past, Scottish Nuclear has been diplomatic in its dealings with government.
It has also been reluctant to embrace privatisation, believing that issues of nuclear waste disposal and decommissioning need to be addressed first.
But Mr Hann yesterday demanded the freedom 'to do what we were asked to do - to run our companies in the most commercial, and safest, ways possible. If remaining in the public sector is going to seriously hinder our progress then partial or even full privatisation may indeed be the best way forward.'
Scottish Nuclear put forward in 1991 its idea that spent nuclear fuel should be kept in 'dry stores' next to its two nuclear power stations in Lothian and Ayrshire, rather than being sent to British Nuclear Fuel's Sellafield plant for reprocessing. The company estimated this would save pounds 45m a year. The proposal was investigated by a public inquiry 18 months ago.
Mr Hann said: 'Although the reporter to the inquiry stated our plans were sound on both engineering and safety grounds, the Secretary of State for Scotland has decided that the Department of the Environment's waste review should consider whether there should be one national dry store or stores sited at each nuclear power plant.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments