Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ANY LINK between leukaemia in children and the exposure of parents to radiation that could cause genetic damage in eggs or sperm before conception is highly unlikely, according to two studies by British and Canadian researchers, writes Liz Hunt.
Their data adds to the growing body of evidence that casts doubt on a 1990 study carried out at Seascale, near the Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant in Cumbria, by Professor Martin Gardner. This linked leukaemia with exposure to ionising radiation at Sellafield.
The first study, reported in tomorrow's issue of the British Medical Journal, looked at all the children born in Cumbria between 1950 and 1989 to fathers employed at Sellafield.
In the second study, by scientists at Toronto University, it was found that children whose fathers worked in the nuclear industry in Ontario were no more likely to develop leukaemia than children whose fathers had not been exposed to ionising radiation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments