Woman killed at crossing Network Rail knew posed ‘unacceptable’ risk – report
The 85-year-old victim was struck and killed by a train at a level crossing near Ashtead, Surrey.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An elderly woman was struck and killed by a train at a level crossing which Network Rail knew posed an “unacceptable” risk, an investigation has found.
The Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) said in a report that “complexities with the technology” meant the Government-owned company had not installed miniature stop lights at the crossing near Ashtead, Surrey, before the fatal incident on April 21 last year.
The 85-year-old victim, who was not named in the report, was walking on Lady Howard footpath and bridleway crossing with a dog and pushing a wheeled trolley bag.
She started to cross the tracks after a train had passed, but was hit by a second out of service Southern train travelling at 62mph in the opposite direction.
A probable underlying factor was that Network Rail had not provided any effective additional risk mitigation at the crossing, despite having previously deemed the risk to users to be unacceptable
The woman responded to hearing the second train’s horn by “hurrying forwards” but was “unable to get clear of the path of the train in time”, the report said.
The investigation found she was “apparently unaware that the second train was approaching” as it was “hidden behind the first train”.
The RAIB said: “A probable underlying factor was that Network Rail had not provided any effective additional risk mitigation at the crossing, despite having previously deemed the risk to users to be unacceptable.”
It recommend that Network Rail addresses the risk to pedestrians at crossings of this type when a second train can be hidden, and implements “appropriate interim risk mitigations” at crossings awaiting “long-term solutions” to safety issues.
Network Wessex route director Mark Killick said: “Our thoughts are with the family and friends of the person who lost their life at our crossing.
“Any death on the railway is a tragedy and we are always trying to make our crossings safer. In this case, we will be installing warning lights at the foot crossing next year, and in the meantime we’ve placed further warning signs at the crossing, alerting users to the risk of further trains coming when one has just passed.
“We worked closely with the RAIB on their report and we accept their findings.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.