Inquiry into pensioner’s level crossing death reopened due to ‘new evidence’
The 85-year-old victim was walking on a level crossing with a dog and pushing a wheeled trolley bag.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An investigation into the death of an elderly woman who was struck by a train on a level crossing has been reopened.
The Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) said “new evidence has been made available” since it published its report into the incident, which happened near Ashtead in Surrey on April 21 last year.
The 85-year-old victim, who was not named in the report, was walking on the Lady Howard footpath and bridleway crossing with a dog and pushing a wheeled trolley bag.
She started to cross the tracks after a train had passed, but was hit by a second train travelling in the opposite direction.
A probable underlying factor was that Network Rail had not provided any effective additional risk mitigation at the crossing, despite having previously deemed the risk to users to be unacceptable
An RAIB report published in February said the pensioner was “apparently unaware that the second train was approaching” because it was “hidden behind the first train”.
It went on: “A probable underlying factor was that Network Rail had not provided any effective additional risk mitigation at the crossing, despite having previously deemed the risk to users to be unacceptable.”
The RAIB recommended Network Rail addresses the risk to pedestrians at crossings of this type when a second train can be hidden, and implements “appropriate interim risk mitigations” at crossings awaiting “long-term solutions” to safety issues.
Network Rail said at the time that it had added more signage at the crossing and will install warning lights next year.