Muslim 'parliament' puts religion before race bias
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE MUSLIM 'parliament' yesterday called for legislation against racial discrimination to be repealed and for the Commission for Racial Equality to be abolished.
A discussion paper for members of the unelected assembly said that anti-racist laws and institutions should be replaced by new legislation against religious discrimination which would allow writers such as Fay Weldon and Connor Cruise O'Brien to be prosecuted for 'anti-Islamic' statements made in defence of Salman Rushdie.
The CRE works solely for victims of racial prejudice and does not believe that mainland Britain needs religious laws. This policy is anathema to the leading Muslim separatists in Britain, several of whom are white. To them religion is far more important than colour.
The assembly's report condemned the CRE for rejecting the centrality of religion and trying to assimilate Muslims into British society. The CRE was part of an attempt to trap Muslims into accepting 'false national, racial or linguistic identities'.
Its intellectual assumptions showed an overriding concern 'to ensure that Muslims and their religion would be reduced to a series of rituals so that gradually Muslims would become like British Christians'. This was a colonial policy, the report alleged.
The report cited in evidence against the CRE a statement from Bikhu Parekh, the organisation's former deputy chairman, in which he had defended Salman Rushdie - author of The Satanic Verses - as a writer who had shown 'tenderness, sensitivity and taste' and criticised some British Muslims for reacting to the death threat against him with 'immaturity and indecent haste'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments