Murder plot extradition order is challenged
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
THE HOME Secretary failed to consider the quality of the evidence against two British women when he approved an order extraditing them to the United States on murder conspiracy charges, the High Court was told yesterday.
Colin Nicholls QC, acting for Sally Croft, 43, and Susan Hagan, 47, two former members of the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh cult in Oregon, said the then Home Secretary, Kenneth Clarke, was wrong to say that the strength of the evidence was a matter for any eventual trial.
Mr Nicholls, who is seeking to have Mr Clarke's order overturned by judicial review, said that although it was accepted that there was a prima facie case against the two women, the Home Secretary should adopt a higher standard of proof than the magistrate who ordered the extradition and consider the strength and reliability of the evidence. In reply, Lord Justice Russell and Mr Justice Blofeld said the Home Secretary should examine all the circumstances rather than seek a higher standard of proof.
The women cite several grounds for saying that Mr Clarke should not have ordered their removal to the US.
The case continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments