MPs' pay free to soar under new review rules
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE SALARIES of Members of Parliament may rise sharply in future, taking them well above the rate of inflation and out of line with the pay of senior civil servants. The move follows a Whitehall decision to put MPs' pay under the new Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB).
The Government has embarked on a sweeping shake-up of top public service salaries which mean that recommendations for judges, senior armed forces ranks and the most senior civil servants will in future have to take into account the state of the economy.
The changes were included in a written parliamentary answer by the Prime Minister last week, which changed the name and function of the old Top Salaries Review Body. The SSRB will be asked to include 'affordability' among its criteria.
Up to now the TSRB has recommended salary levels appropriate to recruitment and retention of top-calibre staff and the levels for jobs of comparable responsibility in the private sector.
It has been up to the Government to decide whether it can afford them. The Review Body will now be constrained by its need to take into account the state of public finances.
But in the longer term the change is seen in Whitehall as holding out the prospect of higher overall pay for MPs, because it could pave the way for their salaries to be decoupled from those of civil servants. Under a five-year- old formula, MPs' pay is fixed at 89 per cent of the level of assistant secretaries.
The Prime Minister said in his answer that the Review Body would now take account of evidence 'it receives about wider economic considerations and the affordability of its recommendations'. But he also announced that the body could also be asked 'from time to time' to report on the pay and pensions of MPs and ministers.
One reason for a possible change in the method of fixing MPs' pay is that because civil service salaries are increasingly fixed according to performance and merit, it will be difficult to tie MPs' salaries to Whitehall levels.
MPs agreed to freeze their pounds 30,594-a-year pay last November after being promised that they would be paid the 3.9 per cent - due to them last January - in January next year. The Government asked them to accept the one-year freeze to set an example, after the announcement of the 1.5 per cent ceiling on pay in the public services.
Beside their salaries, MPs receive an office costs allowance of pounds 39,960, additional costs for accommodation in London, and London travel allowances.
In the United States, Representatives receive pounds 70,000 a year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments