Mother who broke baby's legs is freed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.(First Edition)
A MOTHER jailed for four years for breaking her newborn baby's legs was freed yesterday when the Court of Appeal ruled that her sentence was 'excessive'.
Lisa Piper, 22, who is pregnant with her third child, was jailed at Hove Crown Court, East Sussex, in August after admitting two charges of causing grievous harm to her daughter, Kylie.
Allowing her appeal, Lord Justice Waite, sitting with Mr Justice Hidden and Mr Justice Harrison, quashed the sentence and put her on probation for three years.
At her trial, Judge John Gower told her: 'You treated that child cruelly and caused grave injuries to her.'
Kylie, born four weeks prematurely in April last year, was admitted to the Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital in Brighton after a midwife spotted bruises on her body.
She had a broken thigh bone and shin bones. The court was told she had suffered the injuries when her legs were yanked by her mother on two separate occasions.
The appeal judges ruled that the decision to jail Piper, formerly of Brighton, was right but new psychiatric and probation reports indicated that four years had been excessive.
The court accepted Piper had not meant to harm the child, who has now been adopted, but had acted out of tiredness and frustration.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments