Mother sues council over son's brain damage
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A MOTHER yesterday started High Court action for damages against Surrey County Council and a registered childminder she says are to blame for her son being left brain damaged and partially sighted.
Cora Dowling, 33, claims the council was negligent in allowing her to place her six-month- old baby Thomas with Christine Walton.
She also alleges Mrs Walton and her husband Martin, of Ashford, Surrey, are responsible for Thomas's injuries.
They took Thomas to hospital in September 1989 after he became pale, floppy and unresponsive during a nappy change. He was in such a serious condition he was baptised.
Bleeding behind the eyes was diagnosed and he was transferred to Great Ormond Street Hospital for Sick Children, where doctors said his injuries were caused by violent shaking or a direct blow. It was accepted by police and social services that Ms Dowling, of Ashford, was not to blame, her counsel, Lionel Swift QC, said.
The hearing was adjourned until today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments