No one party should have a veto over Stormont future, Micheal Martin says
It comes as DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson suggested his party would not return to powersharing if issues over the protocol are not resolved.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Irish premier Micheal Martin has said “no one party should have a veto” over the future of Stormont
The Taoiseach was responding to comments by DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson, who said his party would have difficulty reforming a Stormont executive after the upcoming Assembly election if issues with the Northern Ireland Protocol were not resolved.
Mr Martin said the DUP should have awaited the outcome of UK-EU negotiations on the protocol, and that people in Northern Ireland want to see elected representatives take their seats.
Speaking in Dublin on Friday, Mr Martin said: “No one party should have a veto over whether the Executive exists or continues on, and likewise with the Assembly.
“I believe that decision is very damaging to politics itself, and to people’s trust in politics.
“Because people, when they elect public representatives, I think there’s a fair expectation from the public that those political representatives would serve in the Assembly or in the Executive, and do what they campaigned to do.
“We know there’s many issues – Women’s Aid are out today, for example, on a range of issues to do with violence against women that’s currently going through the Assembly.
“That can still be legislated for and in my view should be legislated for.”
Mr Martin said the DUP should have awaited the outcome of UK-EU negotiations before making a decision.
He said European Commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic had shown “good faith” and “responded quickly” to concerns over the Northern Ireland Protocol.
“It’s not the European Union’s fault that this has gone on so long in respect of the talks around the resolution of issues pertaining to the protocol and the trade agreement,” Mr Martin said.
“Those discussions are now continuing between the European Union and the United Kingdom.
“The conclusion of those should have been awaited, in my view.
“A lot of progress has been made. And a lot of advances were made by the European Union side, and they’re still prepared to engage with the United Kingdom and those talks are continuing.”
They want political representatives to take their seats, follow through, pass the legislation, represent people on the issues that people want to be represented on.
He said he did not see the forthcoming Assembly elections becoming a “referendum” on the future of the Protocol, saying people in Northern Ireland want to see the “bread and butter issues” addressed.
“They want political representatives to take their seats, follow through, pass the legislation, represent people on the issues that people want to be represented on.
“There is an emerging centre ground in Northern Ireland that want politics to change to those issues, the bread and butter issues matter to people in Northern Ireland, just as they do in the Republic and across Europe.
“In that respect, I think we’ll see whether the UK talks conclude in the next while. That could be important as well.
“There will be those who try to make it into that type of referendum.
But I think for far too long, that has been a sort of feature of the electoral cycle in Northern Ireland.
“I think bread and butter issues do matter to people in Northern Ireland.”
Earlier, Sir Jeffrey expressed doubts about the prospect of a short-term return to a fully-functioning devolved administration in the wake of the resignation of his party’s First Minister Paul Givan.
The decision to pull Mr Givan out of office is part of the DUP’s escalating protest strategy against the post-Brexit trading arrangements that have created economic barriers between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.
Mr Givan’s resignation, which came into effect at midnight, automatically removed Sinn Fein deputy First Minister Michelle O’Neill from her position.
Other Stormont ministers can remain in post but the Executive can no longer meet and is unable to take significant policy decisions.
An Assembly election is already scheduled for May. Mr Givan’s departure raises the prospect of that poll being brought forward several weeks.
Sir Jeffrey has suggested the DUP would only return to an executive if its concerns around the post-Brexit trading arrangements are addressed.
“I’ve withdrawn the First Minister on the basis that the protocol issues have not been addressed despite clear commitments and promises given by the Prime Minister that they would be addressed, and clearly if the protocol issues are not resolved by the time of the election then, of course, it is difficult for us to form a government because of the instability that the protocol creates,” he told BBC Radio Ulster.