Prior permission from inspector needed for strip searches in two London boroughs
The measure has been introduced following outrage over the strip search of a black school girl in 2020.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Prior permission from a police inspector will be needed in two London boroughs before any child can be strip-searched, according to measures introduced following the Child Q scandal.
The Metropolitan Police said it is introducing a pilot across Hackney and Tower Hamlets where an inspector will need to give approval before a strip-search takes place.
This will ensure “appropriate oversight of such an intrusive intervention”, Deputy Assistant Commissioner Laurence Taylor said.
The pilot is to be trialled in the two north-east London boroughs before the force considers expanding it across the capital.
I recognise that the events surrounding Child Q have, understandably, generated high emotion and anger
The measure is in addition to existing requirements, that a conversation with a supervisor should take place and an “appropriate adult” be present.
The case of Child Q – a 15-year-old black schoolgirl who was strip searched by police while on her period after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis – has drawn outrage from the public and politicians.
The search, by female Metropolitan Police officers, took place in 2020 without another adult present and in the knowledge that she was menstruating, a safeguarding report found.
The Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review, conducted by City & Hackney Safeguarding Children Partnership (CHSCP), concluded the strip-search should never have happened, was unjustified and racism “was likely to have been an influencing factor”.
Three police officers have been investigated for misconduct by the Independent Office for Police Conduct, which is finalising its report.
Scotland Yard has apologised and said the incident “should never have happened”.
In a letter to the Mayor of Hackney, Mr Taylor said the force has been “deeply affected by the depth of feeling generated by this incident and understand that we need to do something different to address these ongoing concerns”.
He said: “I recognise that the events surrounding Child Q have, understandably, generated high emotion and anger and I want to listen and respond to communities to build trust where it has been lost.”
He said the force has not been “waiting for reports to be written” and has requested a review of the protocol for officers working in schools.
And he said Police Encounter Panels have been set up in the boroughs to review and scrutinise incidents of community concern as quickly as possible after the event.
It has also committed to ensure that “adultification” training is delivered to all frontline officers in the boroughs, he said.
It is highly likely that adultification – where black children are perceived as older – was a factor in the Child Q case, the safeguarding review found.
Mark Carroll, the chief executive of Hackney Council, replied to Mr Taylor on Friday confirming that the council accepted the Review Panel’s finding that Child Q was “wholly failed”.
https://twitter.com/hackneycouncil/status/1509869441479331858/photo/1
He wrote: “As you recognise, Child Q should have been treated with dignity and respect.
“She should have been treated as the child she is: her rights as a child safeguarded; and her position as a child protected by the adults around her that day.
“It is clear that she was wholly failed, and together we must make sure that this is never allowed to happen again.
“Hackney Council accepts the Review Panel’s finding that this appalling and humiliating experience was ‘likely influenced’ by racism.”