Senior Tory MP Liam Fox received £20,000 donation from Covid testing firm awarded £500m contract
Dr Fox reportedly recommended SureScreen Diagnostics to health secretary Matt Hancock in 2020
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Tory MP Dr Liam Fox received a £20,000 donation earlier this year from a Covid-19 testing company about which he had reportedly contacted the health secretary early in the pandemic.
Dr Fox recommended SureScreen Diagnostics to Matt Hancock in 2020, according to an email seen by the BBC and legal campaign group the Good Law Project. SureScreen Diagnostics would later be awarded a £500m testing contract by the Department of Health and Social Care.
The £20,000 donation to Dr Fox, a former defence secretary, is contained in the MPs’ register of interests and was recorded as being received in June 2022. Dr Fox has been contacted for comment.
According to the BBC, a SureScreen director emailed former GP Dr Fox in June 2020 to tell him that the company was sending “millions of antibody tests” to use in hospitals in Germany, Spain and Sweden. The director also complained that it was “crazy” that the tests could not be used in the UK because they had not been approved by Public Health England.
The BBC reports that North Somerset MP Dr Fox forwarded that email to Mr Hancock, the health secretary at the time. It is not clear if anything resulted directly from Dr Fox’s email, but several months later SureScreen was awarded a contract for a different type of antigen test.
In a statement to the BBC, SureScreen said: “The donation to Dr Fox’s office – not Dr Fox personally – was made by one of the directors of the business. This donation was specifically to support a series of events which include education talks from expert guests. The payment is not connected in any way to lobbying.”
Mr Hancock denied any suggestion of wrongdoing.
All testing suppliers – including SureScreen Diagnostics – were evaluated before contracts were awarded, in line with stringent procurement regulations and transparency guidelines
A spokesperson for Mr Hancock said: “All DHSC [Department of Health and Social Care] contracts are decided, priced and signed off by the civil service, who are independent of Mr Hancock. To suggest any wrongdoing by Mr Hancock is offensive and potentially libellous.
“If Mr Hancock received an email about expanding testing, of course he would have acted on it, irrespective of the source. Not to do so would have been completely irresponsible. Remember: what was happening at the time was a national effort to expand testing, and all this uncovers is people working together to save lives.”
A DHSC spokesperson said: “All testing suppliers – including SureScreen Diagnostics – were evaluated before contracts were awarded, in line with stringent procurement regulations and transparency guidelines. Tests supplied by the UK government also underwent a rigorous scientific evaluation process before distribution, to make sure they were highly effective at detecting Covid-19.”