'Marchioness' legal victory
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Five relatives of party-goers killed in the Marchioness Thames riverboat tragedy won a legal victory which could lead to the first full public hearing on the collision with the Bowbelle in August 1989 when 51 died.
They won the right to challenge a refusal by Dr Paul Knapman, coroner at the inquest into the deaths, to stand down when accused of bias.
Mr Justice Popplewell, in the High Court, ruled that the relatives had an 'arguable' case. He said there was apparent bias in Dr Knapman's reported reference to Margaret Lockwood-Croft, whose son Shaun, 26, died, as 'unhinged'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments