Lords rule against unions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Law Lords yesterday ruled unanimously that employers were within their rights in discriminating against union members who refused to sign individual contracts, writes Barrie Clement.
Ruling in favour of an appeal by the Daily Mail and Associated British Ports, the House of Lords decided that both companies acted lawfully when they withheld pay increases from employees who insisted their earnings should be determined by collective bargaining.
Union leaders denounced the decision, declaring that no other civilised country would tolerate such a state of affairs. More than 140 other similar cases, involving health workers, college lecturers and dockers will now also fall.
Ironically, the legislation, which allowed the companies to pay union loyalists less, was introduced by a Labour government in 1978.
Since the cases involving the Mail and ABP began, the Government introduced even tougher legislation that makes discrimination far easier to support in law. It was introduced too late to affect the present cases.
The new statute was appended at a late stage to the Trade Union Reform and Employment Rights Bill 1993 after a Court of Appeal ruling declared the action by the Mail and ABP to be unlawful.
Yesterday, however, the Law Lords delivered the final judgement which reinforces the 1993 statute.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments