London needs own government, Major told
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE ONLY way to improve quality of life in London is for the establishment of a new city-wide government for the capital, the Institute for Metropolitan Studies claims today in an open letter to the Prime Minister.
In a report, A Fresh Start for London, which has already been sent to Downing Street, the institute, a non-political organisation, calls for the establishment of a body with clearly defined aims that would co-operate rather than conflict with central government. The report was compiled on behalf of the institute by Sir James Swaffield, former director-general of the Greater London Council; Sir Alan Greengross, a former director of the Port of London Authority and member of the GLC; Maurice Stonefrost, deputy pro- vice chancellor, City University; Sir Frank Layfield, president of the Association of County Councils; and Sir Ralf Dahrendorf, former director of the London School of Economics and chairman of Newspaper Publishing plc which publishes the Independent.
The study comes six years after the abolition of the GLC, and in the face of Tory opposition to any kind of elected authority for the capital. It warns that London is threatened by a fast-decaying physical and social environment. It identifies five problem areas to which the proposed authority would pay particular attention among which are transport and the need for London-wide land use assessment for projects like Channel tunnel rail terminals.
'The disparate bodies which have partial responsibilities for these matters are increasingly regarded as ineffective,' it suggests.
The report rejects the idea of a Minister for London and for an elected mayor because of the possibility for 'potentially damaging conflict with central government'. Instead, it counsels the establishment of a central authority that would work with both central government and the boroughs to represent the interests of Londoners. The new authority would consist of two bodies - a small executive, elected by London residents, and a larger standing conference on which all the London MPs would sit, and an equal number of borough representatives.
Leading article, page 20
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments