Lockerbie relatives criticise trial decision: Government accused of 'abandoning victims and families'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LOCKERBIE relatives yesterday bitterly criticised the decision by Scotland's chief prosecutor to reject new proposals to try the two Libyans accused of the bombing in an international court.
Prosecution authorities and the Government were blocking progress towards a trial and had 'abandoned' the victims and their families, they said.
Under the new plan, put forward by Robert Black, an Edinburgh University law professor, a Scottish prosecutor would present the case against the two men before a panel of judges in the International Court of Justice in the Hague.
Earlier this month Omar al- Muntasser, the Libyan foreign minister, approved the plan and Colonel Muammar Gaddafi repeated Libya's acceptance in a speech on Saturday.
Lawyers representing the suspects described it as constructive. But a spokesman for Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Scotland's senior law officer, dismissed the proposals as unworkable. 'There is no legal machinery to try the two accused in an international tribunal,' he said. The Foreign Office said the suspects could only be tried in a British or American court.
Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi and Al Amin Khalifa Fhima have refused to surrender for trial in Britain or America, arguing that a jury would be prejudiced against them.
International lawyers say a special court could be set up to try the men. Rob Siekmann, for the Asser Institute of International Law, said: 'If states and international organisations agree, they can do anything. If the countries involved requested the UN Secretary General to create an ad hoc tribunal for the trial, he could ask the Security Council to do so but it would have to be something new - like the Yugoslavia war crimes tribunal.'
A UN tribunal was set up in the Hague last year to try those accused of committing crimes against humanity in the war in the Balkans.
Dr Jim Swire, spokesman for British relatives of the 270 people killed in December 1988, said last night: 'Britain, as a member of the United Nations Security Council, voted to set up the Yugoslavia war crimes tribunal. Five years after the biggest mass murder in British criminal history, they will not agree to similar plans to try the accused.
'We have made it clear that we want a trial because we cannot begin to come to terms with the tragedy until we know why it happened and who ordered it. If there was an ounce of political will, the new proposals would have been implemented. The Government has abandoned the victims and their relatives.'
Professor Black last night described the Government's rejection as disappointing. 'It is the British government which is blocking progress. They do not appear to want a trial,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments