Livestock export proposals attacked
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEW rules on the export of live animals can be enforced in only one country outside Britain, the Government admitted yesterday. William Waldegrave, the Minister of Agriculture, unveiling the plans on Wednesday, described them as a 'tough' way of tackling cruelty to livestock in transit, but the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF) said yesterday that only France had agreed to monitor the British scheme.
A spokesman said British inspectors had no jurisdiction abroad and would not be tracking rogue hauliers. Outside Britain and France, he said, the most realistic chance of catching lawbreakers was through RSPCA investigations.
Under Mr Waldegrave's proposals, hauliers must submit detailed plans of their route to a government vet, including staging posts where they intend to feed and water the animals. If they deviate from that route, or fail to adequately care for the livestock, they could be charged with a new criminal offence and fined pounds 5,000. Where 10 or more animals are involved the fine can be pounds 1,000 per animal per offence, or one month in prison per offence.
The proposals were criticised by the RSPCA and by the P&O, Brittany and Stena Sealink ferry companies, which said the rules did not go far enough to prevent a ban on carrying live animals destined for slaughter on the continent.
All the parties said the new rules were pointless without European- wide enforcement, but MAFF said: 'We felt it was time to take unilateral action, but we are still going to press in Europe to try and get measures in place that are as effective as ours.'
The Road Haulage Association joined in the criticism of Mr Waldegrave's plans last night, describing them as 'a bureaucratic nightmare'.
Ben McGuire, secretary of the RHA's Livestock Carriers Group, said: 'They make no allowance for unexpected problems or human error.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments