Libel award first made by a judge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAMAGES of pounds 7,500 have been awarded against Today newspaper in the first libel case to have the size of the award decided by a judge.
Lord Williams QC, chairman of the Bar Council, made the award after an hour-long hearing in his chambers on Wednesday night.
Both parties agreed to settle the case by binding arbitration after the newspaper apologised to Mr Justice Popplewell for suggesting that he had 'appeared to nod off' during a murder trial. It is the first libel action to be settled by arbitration rather than a High Court jury, and lawyers hope that the practice may now be adopted.
Daniel Taylor, counsel for the newspaper, said: 'The procedure significantly reduces the risk of a peculiar jury award and has meant a huge saving in both time and costs. The hearing took place within seven weeks of the original article being published and lasted only 58 minutes.'
The only issue to be decided by arbitration procedure was the amount of the award. It was thought that if arbitration was taken up for other libel actions, it was most likely to be used in similar uncontested cases.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments