Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Legend of King Arthur 'created to bolster Welsh'

Simon Denison
Sunday 25 October 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE LEGEND of King Arthur was created as a public relations exercise on behalf of the Welsh people, according to a new study of its origins.

The stories of a chivalrous royal court, Merlin the wizard, and a magical sword - first found in Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain, written in 1139 - have generally been seen as an entertaining fantasy.

But according to John Gillingham, a medieval historian at the London School of Economics, they were written to stifle the idea that the Welsh were uncouth and had a worthless culture.

His research, published in the journal Anglo-Norman Studies, found that Geoffrey, a Welshman, wrote his saga at a time when the Welsh began to suffer English contempt for the first time.

Before the early 12th century, he says, the English had viewed the Welsh, Scots and Irish as 'Christians like themselves', even though they were often at war with one another. But from around 1125, they began to write about the Celts as barbarians.

Geoffrey's work, he explains, should be seen as a response to that growing contempt. In the first history of the pro-Saxon Britons (or Welsh), King Arthur's lineage was traced to Aeneas of Troy, the mythical founder of Rome. His forebears were depicted as town-builders and law-givers - gentle knights not savages.

English contempt for the 12th century Welsh and Scots was partly understandable, the study found. The Celts were as backward, economically and socially, as the English had been in the eighth century.

From 1136-8 a 'great revolt' in Wales had defeated the English armies twice and retrieved much of the country from English hands. Geoffrey intended King Arthur to be identified with the leaders of that revolt, Mr Gillingham said.

The legend had no long-term success as pro-Welsh propaganda, however. It was rewritten and embellished by later Anglo-Norman writers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in