Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Legal aid cuts 'hit 20,000': Changes will deny access to justice

Colin Brown,Political Correspondent
Monday 12 April 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A TOTAL of 20,000 cases involving battered wives and people evicted from their homes will be denied access to justice before cuts in legal aid, imposed yesterday, can be reviewed, the Law Society warned.

The society, which has taken the unprecedented step of seeking a judicial review against Lord Mackay of Clashfern, the Lord Chancellor, over the cuts, said yesterday that it would take at least two months for the case to be heard.

In that time, about 20,000 cases would be denied legal aid, Walter Merrick, for the Law Society, said. 'Battered wives, people evicted from their homes, who need access to the courts to register their legal position, would have been entitled to legal aid yesterday, but will not be today. They are going to suffer a denial of justice,' he said.

The cuts in eligibility for legal aid have been attacked as 'Draconian' and 'wrong in principle' by Lord Taylor of Gosforth, the Lord Chief Justice.

But the Lord Chancellor made it clear that he would not back down. 'His responsibilities are different from mine. I have to consider the question of legal aid from the point of view of public expenditure,' Lord Mackay said in a BBC radio interview.

'What we are seeking to do is limit the rate of growth of the legal aid budget. I believe it is fairly important for this country that public expenditure as a whole should be under control,' he said.

The budget for legal aid was due to increase by 10 per cent a year over the next three years. Lord Mackay said: 'There is not a cut in the budget. Quite the reverse. We have to look at other ways of containing it. This seemed to me to be the fairest.

'What I have done is protect, right across the board of the subject matters presently covered by legal aid, those who need legal aid the most. Those who are at the income support level will get it free.'

Those above the income support level will be expected to contribute towards their legal costs, saving an estimated pounds 43m.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in