Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Garden accessories firm wins legal fight with luxury fashion house Louis Vuitton

Married couple Lawrence and Victoria Osborne used their initials to found L V Bespoke in 2020.

Sam Russell
Thursday 18 January 2024 09:32 EST
Garden accessories firm L V Bespoke has won its legal battle with international fashion house Louis Vuitton (Yui Mok/ PA)
Garden accessories firm L V Bespoke has won its legal battle with international fashion house Louis Vuitton (Yui Mok/ PA) (PA Archive)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A garden accessories business has won its legal battle with international fashion house Louis Vuitton, which had claimed that their firmā€™s name of L V Bespoke could cause ā€œconsumer confusionā€.

Married couple Lawrence and Victoria Osborne used their initials to found L V Bespoke in 2020 when lockdowns hit their incomes from installing kitchens in peopleā€™s homes and from holiday lets.

The keen gardeners spotted an opportunity when struggling to find steel supports for plants, and now sell items such as obelisks that house roses, as well as gnomes and bespoke creations.

They were last year commissioned by the Kingā€™s Sandringham Estate to make metal crowns for the topiary lawn by the house, which Mrs Osborne said was a ā€œmassive thing for usā€.

Mrs Osborne, 48, said she and her 42-year-old husband run the small firm from a workshop at their home in Reepham, Norfolk and employ two to five staff on a seasonal basis.

They tried to register L V Bespoke as a trademark just over two years ago, for goods such as metal plant cages and plants.

ā€œA couple of days before we routinely would have been confirmed with our trademark registration, up popped this fancy London legal company on behalf of Louis Vuitton and I honestly thought it was a joke,ā€ said Mrs Osborne.

The fashion giant, founded in France in 1854, claimed there was a ā€œlikelihood of consumer confusionā€ and that L V Bespoke would ā€œtake unfair advantage of, or would be detrimental toā€ their earlier trademarks, according to papers following a UK Intellectual Property Office hearing.

Mrs Osborne said they decided to fight the objection to their trademark application rather than change the name of the business.

ā€œI could just see the wrong in all of it and the fact we shouldnā€™t be subjected to corporate bullying,ā€ she said.

ā€œThe fact of the matter is they were so polar opposites and it was surreal to think they would compare the metalwork on their handbags to the metalwork that we produce.ā€

Hearing officer Matthew Williams said in his written ruling that ā€œalmost allā€ of L V Bespokeā€™s goods, such as metal plant cages and garden stakes, were ā€œself-evidently dissimilarā€ to Louis Vuittonā€™s ā€œmetal components for leatherwareā€.

ā€œThe only point of commonality is the presence of the same two single letters L and V,ā€ he said.

He found that Louis Vuittonā€™s objection to the trademark registration application ā€œfailed on all groundsā€ and that the ā€œaverage consumerā€¦ would not mistake the marks for one another; there will be no direct confusionā€.

He ordered that Louis Vuitton pay Ā£4,000 to Mr and Mrs Osborne.

Louis Vuitton has a right to appeal against the outcome, issued on Tuesday.

For two years, we've had the handbrake on

Victoria Osborne, L V Bespoke

Mrs Osborne said it had been a ā€œstressful timeā€ but ā€œthankfully common sense has prevailedā€.

She said that fighting the case had cost them ā€œabout Ā£15,000ā€ but there had also been ā€œemotional stress and anxietyā€.

ā€œWhat we canā€™t put a measure on is for this just-over-two-year period we havenā€™t been able to grow our business in the way that we had intended to with our business plan due to the fact we had this hanging over our head, and the anxiety of having to perhaps rename and rebrand,ā€ she said.

ā€œAnything that we had put into our marketing side of things in our growth plan could have been an additional expense that would have been wasted as well.

ā€œFor two years weā€™ve had the handbrake on.ā€

Mrs Osborne, who has three children Mac, 19, Lucas, 16 and Lochlan, eight, said she hopes ā€œgrowth, growth, growthā€ will follow for the business.

Louis Vuitton has been approached for comment.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in