Garden accessories firm wins legal fight with luxury fashion house Louis Vuitton
Married couple Lawrence and Victoria Osborne used their initials to found L V Bespoke in 2020.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A garden accessories business has won its legal battle with international fashion house Louis Vuitton, which had claimed that their firmās name of L V Bespoke could cause āconsumer confusionā.
Married couple Lawrence and Victoria Osborne used their initials to found L V Bespoke in 2020 when lockdowns hit their incomes from installing kitchens in peopleās homes and from holiday lets.
The keen gardeners spotted an opportunity when struggling to find steel supports for plants, and now sell items such as obelisks that house roses, as well as gnomes and bespoke creations.
They were last year commissioned by the Kingās Sandringham Estate to make metal crowns for the topiary lawn by the house, which Mrs Osborne said was a āmassive thing for usā.
Mrs Osborne, 48, said she and her 42-year-old husband run the small firm from a workshop at their home in Reepham, Norfolk and employ two to five staff on a seasonal basis.
They tried to register L V Bespoke as a trademark just over two years ago, for goods such as metal plant cages and plants.
āA couple of days before we routinely would have been confirmed with our trademark registration, up popped this fancy London legal company on behalf of Louis Vuitton and I honestly thought it was a joke,ā said Mrs Osborne.
The fashion giant, founded in France in 1854, claimed there was a ālikelihood of consumer confusionā and that L V Bespoke would ātake unfair advantage of, or would be detrimental toā their earlier trademarks, according to papers following a UK Intellectual Property Office hearing.
Mrs Osborne said they decided to fight the objection to their trademark application rather than change the name of the business.
āI could just see the wrong in all of it and the fact we shouldnāt be subjected to corporate bullying,ā she said.
āThe fact of the matter is they were so polar opposites and it was surreal to think they would compare the metalwork on their handbags to the metalwork that we produce.ā
Hearing officer Matthew Williams said in his written ruling that āalmost allā of L V Bespokeās goods, such as metal plant cages and garden stakes, were āself-evidently dissimilarā to Louis Vuittonās āmetal components for leatherwareā.
āThe only point of commonality is the presence of the same two single letters L and V,ā he said.
He found that Louis Vuittonās objection to the trademark registration application āfailed on all groundsā and that the āaverage consumerā¦ would not mistake the marks for one another; there will be no direct confusionā.
He ordered that Louis Vuitton pay Ā£4,000 to Mr and Mrs Osborne.
Louis Vuitton has a right to appeal against the outcome, issued on Tuesday.
Mrs Osborne said it had been a āstressful timeā but āthankfully common sense has prevailedā.
She said that fighting the case had cost them āabout Ā£15,000ā but there had also been āemotional stress and anxietyā.
āWhat we canāt put a measure on is for this just-over-two-year period we havenāt been able to grow our business in the way that we had intended to with our business plan due to the fact we had this hanging over our head, and the anxiety of having to perhaps rename and rebrand,ā she said.
āAnything that we had put into our marketing side of things in our growth plan could have been an additional expense that would have been wasted as well.
āFor two years weāve had the handbrake on.ā
Mrs Osborne, who has three children Mac, 19, Lucas, 16 and Lochlan, eight, said she hopes āgrowth, growth, growthā will follow for the business.
Louis Vuitton has been approached for comment.