Law lord attacks legal aid cutbacks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MANY PEOPLE are being left vulnerable to exploitation because constraints on the availability of legal aid mean that they can not afford the cost of civil justice, a law lord warned last night.
Lord Woolf said it was 'deplorable' that fewer people qualified for legal aid and so were unable to protect their rights through the courts.
Giving the 1994 Presidential Address to the Bentham Club in London, Lord Woolf accepted that the legal aid budget for England and Wales was 'enormous' - amounting to a total of pounds 1,406m this year.
However, he said that it was the 'unvarnished truth' that millions of people were being deprived of the lifeline of civil legal aid by cutbacks in its availability.
He said: 'While in respect of our health we demand that no one should be prevented because of a lack of means from receiving medical treatment, with regard to civil justice for our fellow citizens our society is prepared to accept a lower standard.
'A system of justice which a very substantial section of its own citizens cannot afford is a system which contains a fundamental flaw and leaves them vulnerable to exploitation.'
In his speech, he said that there should be an urgent review of whether legal aid was being targeted in the most constructive and effective manner and whether there were ways to make litigation accessible to those without great personal wealth, an institution or the legal aid fund to fall back on.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments