Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lamont makes libel accusations

Patricia Wynn Davies,Political Correspondent
Thursday 03 December 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NORMAN LAMONT, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, has demanded apologies, compensation and reimbursement of legal costs over alleged libels in six newspapers, some of them Tory Party stalwarts.

The rare event of a Tory Chancellor turning on his natural supporters - three of the newspapers, the Daily Mail, the Sun and the London Evening Standard, are strongly pro-Conservative - follows the leak of his Access credit card details.

That was followed by the revelation that pounds 4,700 of public money was used to pay libel-related expenses to the law firm Peter Carter-Ruck & Partners last year after Mr Lamont discovered the tenant of his London home, Sara Dale, was a sex therapist. The three other complaints are against the Independent, the Independent on Sunday and the Observer.

Letters from Carter-Ruck and Partners, which Mr Lamont is paying privately, warn that the Chancellor might sue if his complaints are not settled promptly. They cover articles about his recent Thresher wine store purchases, his hotel bill while at the Brighton party conference in October, and an event at Number 11 Downing Street.

The Government insisted that the pounds 4,700 payment - part of a pounds 23,000 bill from the firm relating to Ms Dale's eviction - was justified under hitherto secret guidance to permanent secretaries.

Andrew MacKinlay, the Labour MP for Thurrock, asked the Prime Minister in a written Commons question on how many occasions since 1979 the Government had paid for legal advice for ministers in respect of matters that were partly personal and private, and whether he would list the ministers concerned.

Mr Major replied that there was no central record of such cases and that such advice was normally confidential.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in