Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lady bowlers face drug test

Chris Arnot
Saturday 11 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A DRUGS problem has shaken an unlikely sport - the sedate world of women's bowls.

When the competitors, in their regulation white hats, starched white blouses and white skirts - which must be at least two inches below the knee - gather at Victoria Park, Leamington Spa, later this month for the English Women's Bowls Association's national championships, drug testers from the Sports Council are expected to be there too.

The problem is not anabolic steroids or amphetamines, the curses of more strenuous sports, but beta blockers, drugs routinely prescribed by doctors for people with high blood pressure or heart conditions. They calm tremors that could affect a bowler's performance, so they are on the International Olympic Committee's list of banned substances.

Mary Fitzhenry of the Sports Council points out that bowls is a Commonwealth Games sport and the same procedures apply as in the Olympics. 'We are sympathetic to people who are prescribed beta blockers by doctors for genuine medical need,' she said. 'The last thing we want to do is stop anybody playing bowls for fun. But if a person wants to compete at county, national or international level, beta blockers may give an unfair advantage.'

Doctors agree that there are adequate substitutes for beta blockers. 'For most conditions it would be perfectly possible to find an alternative that doesn't give a player undue advantage,' said Dr Hardial Singh, a consultant cardiologist from Coventry.

The Sports Council's drug control officer held a lengthy meeting with the administrators of women's bowls in April. A letter will go out in September emphasising that a specific reference to beta blockers must be included in the sport's regulations.

'There is still concern about bowls,' said Ms Fitzhenry. 'We don't feel that they are taking the issue seriously enough.'

Nancie Colling, secretary of the English Women's Bowls Association, disagrees. She says there were 36 drugs tests at men's and women's bowls tournaments last year and not one was positive - clear evidence that the association has met all the requirements demanded of it. 'The rules and regulations are written into our yearbook. If anybody playing at representative level has a banned drug prescribed to them, they have to get a substitute.'

There is more at stake than the good name of the sport. If the Sports Council is not satisfied with the measures that the association takes, it could withdraw its pounds 10,000 annual grant to women's bowls.

Ms Fitzhenry said: 'It's no good having a few lines about drugs in the rule book. The governing body must implement a drug control programme.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in