Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour split raises doubt over relaunch

Nicholas Timmins,Political Correspondent
Sunday 13 September 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CONTINUING open revolt over Labour policy on Europe and the economy yesterday threatened to overshadow John Smith's moves to relaunch his party's aims and objectives at the Labour Party conference later this month.

Michael Meacher, Shadow Cabinet member on overseas development, said a referendum on Maastricht would be 'the best way for resolving what may otherwise be an intractable dispute'. There were, he said, 'clearly differences in all political parties on the issue'.

David Blunkett, the party's health spokesman, having declared last week that a realignment within the exchange rate mechanism was 'vital', will today at a national executive meeting attempt to amend Agenda for Change, the document intended to set out Mr Smith's vision for his party, so that a realignment of sterling is not ruled out.

Last night's devaluation of the lira did not change his view that Labour needs to offer an alternative economic policy.

The moves came in spite of private appeals from Mr Smith and Margaret Beckett, the deputy leader, for Shadow Cabinet members to stick to the party line, particularly over devaluation, as Europe waits for the French referendum result next Sunday.

As Paddy Ashdown, the Liberal Democrat leader, condemned Labour's 'open warfare and appalling shambles' on Europe, there were signs yesterday of increasing exasperation from Mr Smith's camp at the repeated breaking of ranks by Shadow Cabinet members. Party officials say that once the referendum result is known, Labour's front benchers will be expected to back the leadership line or face the consequences once the national executive and Shadow Cabinet settle it on 23 September.

Bryan Gould - who was again on the attack over Maastricht yesterday - acknowledged that once decisions were reached 'we'll each then have to abide by that decision or get out'.

Mr Smith's camp and the phalanx of Shadow Cabinet members speaking out acknowledge that the Labour leader has the votes on both the national executive and Shadow Cabinet to prevail.

But that seems to promise at best only a strained frontbench unity on the two key issues at Mr Smith's first party conference as leader the following week. Mr Gould - who is to speak at a conference fringe meeting of the Labour Common Market Safeguards Committee, the redoubt of the old anti-European Community Labour MPs - yesterday gave qualified backing to a referendum.

If the Government attempted to bring the Maastricht Bill back after the French vote in the hope that the Danes would somehow come back on board, he said on TV-am, 'then I think it would be intolerable to foist upon the British people a very substantial loss of their democratic power to govern themselves, without asking them'. Mr Meacher said that a referendum was 'clearly the right way'. Party rifts over Europe were further underlined when 13 Labour MEPs disowned a statement backing the treaty which was circulated last week by the leaders of the Labour European group saying the 45-strong group backed the treaty. A letter to constituency parties from the 13 says: 'This is simply not true.' At least one-third of the group was opposed to the treaty, they said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in