Government must do ‘the sums’ before committing to axing two-child cap – Kendall
The Prime Minister will face pressure from MPs in the Commons to abolish the policy, which was introduced by the Tories in 2015.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government has to do “the sums” before committing to axing the two-child benefit cap, the Work and Pensions Secretary said, as Sir Keir Starmer faces a possible rebellion over the policy in the Commons.
A King’s Speech debate could end with a vote on the matter on Tuesday evening if Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle selects one of several amendments that have been tabled.
The Prime Minister has said there is “no silver bullet” to end child poverty but acknowledged the “passion” of Labour MPs who are considering rebelling over the continuation of the Tory measure.
I’m not into a wink and a nudge politics
Liz Kendall said she is “absolutely passionate about driving down child poverty” and that it is a “real priority for this Government”.
But, pressed on whether that means abolishing the cap, she told Times Radio that Labour was elected “on the promise that we would only make spending commitments that we know we can keep”.
“I’m not into a wink and a nudge politics,” she said.
“I’m not going to look constituents in the face and tell them I’m going to do something without actually having done the sums, figuring out how I’m going to pay for it, figuring out how we transform opportunity for those children, not just in terms of their household income, which is essential, but about having sustained improvements to helping people get work and get on in work, more childcare, early years support, sorting out the dire state of people’s housing.
“It’s got to be part of a much bigger approach.”
She also stressed that the Labour Government cannot tackle the “dire inheritance” from the Tories “overnight”, pointing to crises facing the health service, council budgets, housing and welfare.
Labour MPs have a choice today. They can lift children out of poverty by voting for the SNP amendment to abolish the cap - or they will push children into poverty by keeping it in place
Some left-leaning Labour MPs are prepared to back an amendment tabled by the SNP, which it says is also supported by Plaid Cymru, the Green Party, the SDLP, the Alliance Party, and Independent MPs including Jeremy Corbyn.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said: “Keir Starmer must not fail his first major test in Government by refusing to scrap the cap. It is the bare minimum required to tackle child poverty – and to begin to deliver the change that people in Scotland were promised.
“Labour MPs have a choice today. They can lift children out of poverty by voting for the SNP amendment to abolish the cap – or they will push children into poverty by keeping it in place.
Labour’s former shadow chancellor John McDonnell said he would vote for the SNP change.
In a video posted to X, he said: “37 Labour MPs like me put forward our own amendment to scrap the two-child limit, but that won’t be called. So the only opportunity we’ll have to vote on the two-child limit will be on an SNP motion.
“I’ll be voting for the SNP amendment. I don’t like voting for other parties’ amendments but but I’m following Keir Starmer’s example as he said put country before party. So I’m putting lifting children out of poverty before party whipping or anything like that.”
Kim Johnson and Rosie Duffield are also among the Labour MPs who have urged Sir Keir to change tack, while Conservative Suella Braverman spoke on Monday to support scrapping the limit.
Former home secretary Ms Braverman acknowledged that her party had introduced the cap, but said it is “aggravating child poverty, and it’s time for it to go”.
She said: “Now, I know about the argument ‘don’t have children if you can’t afford them’. For me that’s not compassionate. It’s not fair. It’s not the right thing to do.”
The cap was introduced by then-Conservative chancellor George Osborne in 2015 and restricts child welfare payments to the first two children born to most families.
Against the background of rising child poverty – with more than four million children now living in low-income households – the Prime Minister has been urged by charities, opposition parties and some of his own MPs to abolish the limit.