Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Voters will have to accept pylons or higher taxes, says Starmer

The Prime Minister said new electricity pylons were needed to lower energy bills, with the alternatives being too expensive.

David Hughes
Monday 30 September 2024 05:07 EDT
Sir Keir Starmer said pylons were a necessary ‘trade-off’ for cleaner, cheaper energy, with alternatives being too expensive (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
Sir Keir Starmer said pylons were a necessary ‘trade-off’ for cleaner, cheaper energy, with alternatives being too expensive (Stefan Rousseau/PA) (PA Archive)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Voters will have to accept new pylons if they want lower energy bills as burying cables underground is too expensive, the Prime Minister has said.

Sir Keir Starmer drew criticism last week after saying pylons were a necessary “trade-off” for clean energy during his speech to the Labour Party conference, with campaigners against new pylons in East Anglia saying he had thrown the region “under a bus”.

But the Prime Minister insisted this was not the case, saying the country had “shied away from these trade-offs for too long”.

He told reporters: “If you want lower energy bills, we’re going to have to have pylons above the ground.

“Yes, there is the option to put them below the ground – it costs much more money, and if there’s one consistent theme into and out of the last election, it’s that most people feel they’re already paying too much tax, and I don’t think many would put their hand up to pay more tax in relation to that.”

Plans to build new pylons between Norwich and Tilbury, in Essex, have attracted local opposition, with new Suffolk MP and Green Party co-leader Adrian Ramsay saying there was “huge local concern about the impact on agricultural land, on traffic, on local communities, on the landscape”.

The pylons would carry electricity from wind farms off the coast of East Anglia, in line with the new Government’s commitment to decarbonise the electricity grid by 2030.

National Grid has previously said it has considered alternatives and delaying the project would mean delaying access to cleaner energy in the region.

The Prime Minister said the Government would consult with people on projects, but added: “I do want to be clear: these are serious trade-offs that we’re going to have to make and we’re going to have to take those decisions.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in