Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Julian Assange: Sex assault claims may never be investigated due to Swedish statute of limitations

The Wikileaks founder has never been charged with the four allegations of sexual assaults he is alleged to have committed in Sweden in 2010

Hardeep Matharu
Wednesday 12 August 2015 03:56 EDT
Comments
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been based at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since June 2012
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been based at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London since June 2012 (AFP/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Three of the four allegations of sexual assault against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange may never be investigated as the time limit required to do so will expire in seven days.

Mr Assange, whose Wikileaks website published thousands of US military and diplomatic documents in 2010, has been living in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012.

The 44-year-old was granted political asylum by Ecuador and moved into its embassy in the capital to avoid being extradited to Sweden over allegations of four sexual assaults it is claimed he committed there in 2010.

Mr Assange has never been charged with any offences relating to the claims and denies the allegations.

But the chance for Swedish prosecutors to interview the Wikileaks editor about the claims will run out in a week because of Sweden’s statute of limitations relating to the allegations.

This is the time period within which a person must be charged if they are to be prosecuted for an alleged offence.

The statute of limitations for three of the four claims against Mr Assange is five years from when they were alleged to have been committed against the same person – with the dates of the alleged incidents being 13, 14 and 18 August 2010, reports legal blogger Jack of Kent.

The nature of the fourth sexual assault allegation means it has a ten-year limitation period, according to the blogger.

In March, Swedish prosecutors said that they would be willing to interview Mr Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London – but they were later reportedly not given permission to do so by Ecuador.

“This, of course seems counter-intuitive," Jack of Kent wrote.

"It surely cannot be the case that Assange can rely on his own refusal to go to Sweden to escape answering the allegations."

A spokesperson for the Swedish Prosecution Authority told the blogger: "As long as the prosecutor does not receive permission to interview Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy, there is nothing else she can do before 13-18 August.

"An interview is necessary for the investigation."

Mr Assange fears that if he goes to Sweden he will be taken to the US for questioning over the Wikileaks disclosures.

Swedish prosecutors confirmed the Australian was due to be cleared on the three allegations, according to The Times, while Foreign and Commonwealth Office minister Hugo Swire said the situation was "deeply unsatisfactory and costly".

Claes Borgström, the alleged victim's lawyer, told the newspaper his client felt a "sense of injustice" - but suggested she was keen to put the case behind her.

"At the time of, of course, she wanted Julian Assange to stand before the court to answer the allegations, then time passed.

"She's leading her own normal life. You do not want to recall [the claims] all over again."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in