Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judges get guidelines on 'bad' behaviour

Jason Bennetto,Home Affairs Correspondent
Wednesday 20 July 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JUDGES may race along motorways at 90 miles per hour, park their Mercedes on double yellow lines and refuse to pay parking fines without fear of losing their jobs. But they risk being ousted from the bench if they drive under the influence of drink or drugs or are convicted of crimes involving violence, dishonesty or depravity.

Actions involving racial and religious offence grounds, or amounting to sexual harassment, could also be regarded as 'misbehaving', according to guidelines issued by the Lord Chancellor's Department to the 1,000 full-time judges in England and Wales.

The list of the Beak's dos and don'ts was produced to advise judges on how badly they can behave without risk of being disqualified from sitting in judgement. This follows some notorious cases involving judges.

Details of the letter from Lord Mackay of Clashfern, the Lord Chancellor, were disclosed by the most senior judge, Lord Taylor of Gosforth, the Lord Chief Justice, yesterday. It reveals that judges who faced criminal charges for parking or speeding did not have to let the Lord Chancellor's Department know. It added that convictions for some offences, including motoring matters, were not necessarily incompatible to sitting on the bench.

Lord Taylor said the letter was intended to set out circumstances when the Lord Chancellor might exercise his disciplinary powers so that judges could not turn round and say 'nobody told me so'.

Judges who have 'behaved badly' in recent years include:

Mr Justice Harman, a High Court judge, who kicked a London cab driver in a fracas witnessed by journalists outside his home.

Judge William Crawford QC, 55, who was publicly rebuked for kissing and hugging a court usher at Newcastle upon Tyne Crown Court in September 1992 in an 'over-familiar greeting'.

Recorder Timothy Parkin, of Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, who was convicted of kerb crawling in the red light district of Chapeltown, Leeds, in March 1991.

The Lord Chancellor does not have the power to dismiss High Court judges, Lord Justices of Appeal or Lords of Appeal. Both Houses of Parliament need to approve their dismissal, but it is thought this has not been done for 200 years.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in