Judge defends his sentence on Levitt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE JUDGE who sentenced the City financier, Roger Levitt, to 180 hours community service for deceiving financial regulators, yesterday defended his decision not to impose a prison term.
Mr Justice Laws, sentencing a third man involved in the affair, said the sentencing was not for cheating anyone out of any money, which had already occurred by the time false documents were sent to Fimbra, the regulatory body.
After Levitt, 44, and his managing director, Mark Reed, 40 - who received 120 hours' community service - pleaded guilty to the lesser offence, the Serious Fraud Office dropped more serious charges of fraudulently producing false accounts and fraudulently injecting funds into their company.
The SFO had prepared an even wider indictment alleging that company investors had been defrauded. These were severed by the judge and the Crown decided not to pursue them in a second trial.
Yesterday the judge fined Alan McNamara, another Levitt director, pounds 750 and banned him from being a company director for 18 months for recklessly furnishing false and misleading information to Fimbra. He had also faced the same more serious charges.
Mr Justice Laws told McNamara: 'You don't fall to be sentenced for cheating anybody out of any money whatsoever, as I hoped I had explained last week. That was also the position as regards your co-defendants, Levitt and Reed.
'The confessions by both to fraudulent trading concerned the acts by which Fimbra was deceived in the closing stages of the Levitt Group saga. The persons, including banks and private individuals who had lost money . . . had already lost it by the time false documents were put up to Fimbra.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments