Judge attacks law on torture sentence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A JUDGE complained yesterday that Parliament prevented him passing an effective sentence on a schoolboy who carved his initial in another boy's back during a 'terrifying' torture ordeal.
'Parliament has deprived the courts of any power of detention of a person of this age or of what many people might think was any effective punishment for that grave crime,' Judge Bruce Laughland said at the Old Bailey.
He conceded he did not have the power to pass the sentence of three months' detention which he imposed on the 13-year-old east London boy last week. 'I revoke it,' he said. 'I substitute the most that Parliament allows - that he be placed under a supervision order for a year and undergo 90 days of supervised activities.'
Judge Laughland said the boy, together with two older boys, had kidnapped the 14-year-old and taken him to Epping Forest.
'There he was subjected to a terrifying experience which included this defendant carving his initials on his body,' he said.
A child under the age of 14, however dangerous and however heinous the crime, could not be locked up for anything short of homicide.
'The responsibility for what might occur by letting such dangerous children at liberty is the responsibility of Parliament,' the judge said.
The schoolboy pleaded guilty last week to false imprisonment and wounding. Two youths were jailed for two years and 18 months.
Their victim, the court was told, had his hair pulled out, his hands slashed, was whipped with a studded belt and beaten until he became unconscious.
The 13-year-old burned his chest with lighted cigarettes and cut the letter 'M' into the boy's back. The attackers were said to be taking revenge on the 14-year-old because he was a bully.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments