Deadline for Johnny Mercer to hand over whistleblower names extended
PA understands a decision on Mr Mercer’s application to the Afghanistan Inquiry could take at least a week to be reached.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Veterans’ minister Johnny Mercer will no longer have to meet Friday’s deadline to hand over the names of those who told him about alleged special forces murders in Afghanistan.
Sir Charles Haddon-Cave, chairman of the Afghanistan Inquiry, gave Mr Mercer until 4pm on April 5 to provide a witness statement containing the names or face a potential prison sentence.
This deadline has now been extended while the chairman considers Mr Mercer’s application to challenge the order and PA understands a decision could take at least a week to be reached.
During Mr Mercer’s evidence to the inquiry last month, the chairman said his decision to “refuse to answer legitimate questions … at a public inquiry” were “disappointing … surprising … and completely unacceptable”.
The one thing you can hold on to is your integrity and I will be doing that with these individuals
This came after Mr Mercer repeatedly refused to hand over names of “multiple officers” who told him about allegations of murder and a cover-up, during his time as a backbench MP.
On Tuesday, the MP for Plymouth, Moor View posted on X, formerly Twitter: “I am aware of tomorrow’s deadline from the Afghan Inquiry order that requires me to name the whistleblowers who confided in me.
“I am submitting an application to challenge the order under section 21(4) of the Inquiries Act 2005 seeking to have the Section 21 notice set aside.
“It would not be appropriate to comment further.”
Giving his reason for not disclosing the names, he told counsel to the inquiry Oliver Glasgow KC last month: “The one thing you can hold on to is your integrity and I will be doing that with these individuals.”
The inquiry said Mr Mercer was served with a Section 21 notice on March 13, compelling him to hand over the names, which the inquiry has said will be “treated in confidence”.
In the order, the chairman said the consequences of failing to comply without reasonable excuse would be “a criminal offence punishable with imprisonment and/or a fine”.