Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Is cannabis more harmful than alcohol? 'No comment' says the UK government

Cannabis legalisation petition was shot down by the Home Office last month

Christopher Hooton
Wednesday 02 September 2015 11:00 EDT
Comments
(Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A few weeks ago, a parliamentary petition calling for the government to ’make the production, sale and use of cannabis legal’ attracted over 200,000 signatures from the public, meaning it would be considered for debate in the House of Commons and causing many to hope that an issue overhauling laws around the world might finally be discussed properly and sensibly in the UK.

The Home Office issued a crushing response however, claiming that “substantial scientific evidence shows cannabis is a harmful drug that can damage human health,” and dismissing the idea that the legalisation of the drug would bring huge tax benefits and a reduction in crime from its illicit trade.

Obligatory government response over with, the petition is now set to be shelved, with no parliamentary debate date in sight.

It’s a perplexing stance, given Colorado has made so much money from cannabis that it’s having to actually give some back to taxpayers, Denver police have said that ‘everything’s fine’ a year on from legalisation, and the House of Lords has declared UK drug laws a “laughing stock”.

I asked the Home Office whether, given its view that cannabis causes ‘harm to individuals and society’, “do they believe then, that cannabis (class B) is a more harmful drug than alcohol (legal)?”

Their reply: “We wouldn’t have anything to add to the government response.”

In the US, the issue is very much on the table.

President Obama recently said “we should follow the science as opposed to ideology” on the matter, and, in a major step forward, the White House lifted a much-maligned bureaucratic requirement that had stifled scientific research into cannabis.

Back in February, a study published in Scientific Reports, a subsidiary of the journal Nature, found that weed is 114 times less deadly than alcohol.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in