Irish victim of racist jokes awarded pounds 6,000: Landmark tribunal ruling over taunts at machinist's expense sends warning to employers over workplace culture
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Northern Irishman driven from his job because he refused to laugh along with Irish jokes and taunts has won pounds 6,000 compensation after an industrial tribunal ruled that he was a victim of racial discrimination.
The unanimous ruling in favour of Trevor McAuley, often dubbed a 'typical thick Paddy', was said to be the first case of its kind involving racist abuse against the Irish, although tribunals have decided a number of people have been sacked or failed to get jobs because of their Irish origins.
The Commission for Racial Equality - which supported Mr McAuley, 36, in his fight - said the case was a landmark as it sent a message to employers that it was unacceptable to allow such a workplace culture to develop.
With the removal of the pounds 12,000 ceiling for compensation from next month, firms could find themselves facing substantial awards of two or three times the old limit.
The case also points up moves by the commission to formally recognise the 1.5 million Irish in Britain as a distinct ethnic group in race relations law, and the spotlight that would throw on firms' recruitment policies. But the case brought by Mr McAuley, originally from Ballymoney, Co Antrim, was brought before the Nottingham tribunal on the grounds that the jokes and taunts amounted to racial discrimination under the Race Relations Act.
He said he was subjected to 'persistent and continuous' jibes by some colleagues and even the general manager of Auto Alloys Foundry at Blackwell, Derbyshire, where he was a skilled machinist.
'I suppose it started as a joke and progressed and progressed,' Mr McAuley, of Swanwick, Derbyshire, said. He said he was victimised as 'a thick Irishman' and added: 'When they saw you were standing up for yourself, they didn't like it, especially the manager.
'I complained to the management about the Irish remarks and taunts day in, day out, five days a week, and was told not to worry about it. When I made further complaints I was told I had an attitude problem.'
The stress eventually told on the family life of Mr McAuley, married with two stepsons, as well as his health and his self-confidence. He was dismissed 10 months ago after he had been with the company almost two years.
But the tribunal, chaired by a judge, was in no doubt about the reason for his sacking. It was 'principally because he was an Irishman who would not take Irish jokes lying down, in other words, he did not 'fit in'.
'We find no reasonable explanation for the management not taking all reasonable steps to stop such remarks being made. Therefore we have no hesitation in saying that there was direct discrimination by those using racial words.'
But Auto Alloys said jokes were part and parcel of the shop-floor culture. Dan Taylor, managing director, said: 'I asked how I could stop Irish jokes. To try to do that in a industrial environment would make matters far worse.'
Aubrey Rose, chairman of the commission's legal committee, said such a culture was common in some areas. 'There is not sufficient control and clamping down from those in superior positions . . . In future, employers will have to watch very carefully.'
(Photograph omitted)
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments