‘Insulting’ to suggest Irish men were in Colombia for peace process – archives
‘A far better course would be to admit that a mistake had been made and say that it would not happen again,’ a US diplomat said.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A suggestion that three republicans were on holiday in Colombia rather than training rebels was said to be “insulting to (the) intelligence” of diplomats, archive documents show.
There was concern at the time that the arrest of the so-called Colombia Three in 2001 could damage the Northern Ireland peace process.
The incident happened after the IRA agreed on a way of disabling its arsenal, following months of slow progress.
Colombian authorities alleged that the men were training members of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, also known as Farc.
The men were convicted of training rebels and sentenced to 17 years in prison in 2004; they were granted amnesty in 2020 as part of Colombia’s peace process.
In 2022, it was reported that their amnesty had been revoked.
The Colombia Three have always denied wrongdoing, maintaining they were in the country to observe Colombia’s peace negotiations.
The three men, who were travelling on false passports, Niall Connolly, James Monaghan, and Martin McCauley, were arrested on August 11 2001 at Bogota International Airport.
In newly released State documents, the discussion between top Irish and US officials in the aftermath of the arrests show that the US’ Special Envoy for Northern Ireland Richard Haass was angry at the incident.
In a meeting between Mr Haas and Ireland’s Ambassador to the US Sean O hUiginn, he said the men were “not on vacation, they were not promoting a peace process”.
“It was not only implausible to try to put across such explanations but insulting to our intelligence.
“A far better course would be to admit that a mistake had been made and say that it would not happen again.
“It was far more likely that the detainees were involved in some kind of ‘transfer of knowhow about bomb-making’.”
A briefing document written for the Department of Foreign Affairs detailed a meeting in Washington DC between Mr Haass and Ireland’s Ambassador to the US Sean Ó hUiginn.
The document notes that the Irish and British governments were “obviously in stocktaking mode to work out a strategy in relation to developments in the peace process, including of course the Colombia dimension”.
“The benign explanation that the three might have been engaged in peace education was not sustainable.
“Rather the choice was from the malign menu, for example, of some kind of weapons dealing, testing or training,” the note dated September 7 2001 said.
The material can be viewed in the National Archives in file 2023/53/29
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.