Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Investigators face conflicting cell death claims

Union raises questions over whether ministers knew of accused murderer' s prison routine as attention centres on suicide risk

James Cusick
Monday 02 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Investigations into how Frederick West was able to hang himself while under a regime of close supervision are likely to hear conflicting evidence over the times prison officers were scheduled to check his cell.

Two investigations into the apparent suicide of West - one by the West Midlands Police and another by the authorities at Winson Green Prison in Birmingham - learned yesterday that there is already conflicting claims over the supervision orders accorded to West. Although prison officers coming off their shift yesterday defended their role and claimed that West was "checked every 15 minutes", John Bartell, general secretary of the Prison Officers' Association, insisted that a decision had been taken to lift a "special watch" on West.

This was confirmed last night by the director general of the Prison Service, Derek Lewis, who said West was not subject to 15-minute checks. Mr Lewis also said that West had not been assessed as being a suicide risk and that precautions such as classification were, therefore, not in place.

Mr Bartell said West was on the 15-minute check routine when he first arrived at Winson Green. However, he claimed this was later relaxed. He said: "Because he assimilated quite quickly into the prison routine, local managers, presumably with permission from head office, removed these special watch facilities and Frederick West actually associated with other prisoners in his same category on a number of occasions.

"That decision, I presume, would have been authorised by head office." Speaking on BBC Radio, Mr Bartell said he would be "shocked" if the decision had been made solely at local level. He added: "It must have gone to the director of operations at the Prison Service. One would assume with such a high-profile prisoner that at least the minister would have been informed."

However, Winson Green's principal prison officer, Terry O'Dwyer, said everything possible was done to protect West.

He insisted West was checked at 15-minute intervals, but said: "If someone is determined to commit suicide, as hard as we try, they will."

With Mr Lewis claiming there had been no initial "at risk" categorisation of West, and that there had been no ministerial interference, the inquiries now have contradictory statements that will require attention.

Staff at the prison said West must have hanged himself immediately after a routine check was made. Mr O'Dwyer said an officer, using a cell viewing panel, would have seen West was all right just minutes before he committed suicide. West was discovered at12.55pm and was certified dead at 1.22pm.

On New Year's Day, the Independent, speaking to a Prison Service source, understood that West was categorised as a "vulnerable" inmate and had been under 30 minute checks.

Before Mr Lewis's statements, the Home Office said no details could be released, but added: "There are no rules governing the supervision of those at risk." On the precise categorisation of West and whether he was deemed "vulnerable", it refused to comment.

Leading article, page 13

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in