Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Inquiry into 'use of Ouija board' by jurors

Thursday 23 June 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

EVERY member of a jury that convicted an insurance broker of a double killing is to be asked about claims that four jurors used a Ouija board to 'talk' to one of the victims.

The Court of Appeal yesterday agreed to inquire into allegations that the Ouija board was used during an overnight hotel stay. These form the basis of Stephen Young's intended appeal against his conviction for shooting Harry and Nicola Fuller in Wadhurst, East Sussex. Young, 35, of Pembury, Kent, was jailed for life at Hove Crown Court last year.

Lord Taylor, the Lord Chief Justice, ordered an investigation to be conducted by the Treasury Solicitor and a senior police officer. He said statements should be obtained from all the jurors.

He emphasised that the inquiry must be restricted to the 'irregularity' alleged to have happened at the hotel and must not cover deliberations in the jury room.

The Contempt of Court Act forbids anyone to inquire into jury-room secrets. The decision to launch an investigation into what happened at the hotel suggests a view that this did not form part of the jury's 'deliberations'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in